Cromley v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 1101 · 38 U.S.C. § 1112 · 38 U.S.C. § 1137 · 38 U.S.C. § 1159 · 38 U.S.C. § 5107 · 38 U.S.C. § 7252 · 38 U.S.C. § 7261
Relies on Gilbert v. Derwinski · Frankel v. Derwinski · Murphy v. Derwinski · Butts v. Brown · Suttmann v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As the Board noted, the appellant is already rated at 10%, the highest level possible under the regulations for tinnitus.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. Nicholson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.