Paulson v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2016
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 101 (Agent Orange Act of 1991) · 38 U.S.C. § 1111 · 38 U.S.C. § 1112 · 38 U.S.C. § 1131 · 38 U.S.C. § 1132 · 38 U.S.C. § 1153 · 38 U.S.C. § 312 · 38 U.S.C. § 7104
Relies on Gilbert v. Derwinski · Colvin v. Derwinski · Hunt v. Derwinski · Bagby v. Derwinski · Browder v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any period of active duty for training during which the individual concerned was disabled or died from a disease or injury incurred or aggravated in line of duty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a person who served in the active military, naval, or air service.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.