7 VI 13 - Dickerson v. Hodge

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2016

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

¶2This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment for the plaintiff in a suit brought to settle the location of the boundary line between Lots 9 and 8A Adel Gade in *14■King’s Quarter of the town of Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, owned, respectively, by the plaintiff and the defendant. The district court reviewed the facts and concluded that the true boundary between the lots was that contended for by the plaintiff and shown on a survey plan dated November 8,1956, prepared by Sidney Baptiste, surveyor. We find ourselves in complete accord with the findings and conclusions of the district court as stated in its opinion to which we need add nothing.

¶3The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.