Baumann v. Canton’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2011
2 federal appellate · 10 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hopper, McGaw & Co. v. Kelly · Garner v. Pittman · State v. Arena · Janeway v. Lafferty Bros. · United States v. Marshall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o person shall drive a motor vehicle on a public street or highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing. In every event speed shall be so controlled as may be necessary to avoid colliding with any person, vehicle or other conveyance on the public street or highway.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““It is a well established rule that a motorist must operate his vehicle always with due regard for the safety of all others on the highway. He is charged with the duty of keeping his automobile under such control that he can stop within the distance on the road ahead which he can clearly see. The law exacts of him constant care and attention and imposes upon him certain positive duties * * * (Footnote omitted).” Id. at 67 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. MacGibbon v. Smalls“the mere fact that an automobile which is involved in an accident is being operated in violation of a regulation does not render the driver of the vehicle guilty of negligence as a matter of law if there are any facts which will excuse his conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. Rene
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.