¶1 (dissenting) — I concur in the views expressed by Judge Simpson, but will add, further, that, in my opinion, the fourth element necessary to constitute a joint venture is lacking, namely, that of an equal right to a voice in the performance of the undertaking and an equal right of control over the agencies used in the performance. The facts in this case, as I view them, do not support an inference that respondent had any right of control over the automobile used on the trip, or that it was within the contemplation of the parties that any such right was conferred upon him. The inferences, I think, are to the contrary.
7 Wash. 2d 695
110 P.2d 887
Manos v. James
Decided March 6, 1941
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1941-03-06
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1941-03-06
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 1985
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →