Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 7 Wash. App. 190 - State v. Kuhn

7 Wash. App. 190 - State v. Kuhn’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
11
states following
April 1996
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 1996 · most notably 62 Ill. 2d 200 - People v. Dowery (1975), United States v. Vandemark (1975)

3 federal appellate · 29 state decisions — followed in 11 states

190197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 7 Cal. App. 3d 604 - People v. Hayko · Martin v. United States · United States v. Hallman · U. S. Ex Rel. Lombardino v. Heyd · 60 Wash. 2d 883 - State v. Shannon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Expansion of the exclusionary rule to probation hearings would probably further its laudible purpose of deterring unconstitutional methods of law enforcement. But the good to be obtained from such expansion must be balanced against the harm which would result from lessening the necessary controls over probationers and the possibility of judges becoming reluctant to utilize this valuable tool of rehabilitation of offenders. The due process. safeguards of a fair hearing spelled out in State v. Riddell [ 75 Wn.2d 85 , 449 P.2d 97 (1968)], and other cases from this jurisdiction, furnish adequate protection for the rights of probationers at a revocation of probation hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.