7 Wash. App. 434 - Hinderer v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
January 1983
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 75 Wash. 2d 522 - Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co. · 2 Wash. App. 399 - Stark v. Allis-Chalmers · Patterson v. Wenatchee Canning Co. · 59 Wash. 2d 280 - Crowley v. Barto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * Reliance is not an element of the warranty of merchantability. [Citing statute.] It is an element of the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. [Citing statute.] * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ * * * there is no implied warranty with regard to defects which an examination ought in the circumstances to have revealed to him * * * ” (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.