Rasmussen v. Richards’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1981
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Getz v. Freed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here is testimony by a number of witnesses that it was not customary for a player in defendant's situation in such circumstances to shout `fore' before driving his ball, but only to do so when it could be observed that the ball was slicing so as to carry it to the right in the direction of the No. 4 tee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“there was ample credible evidence to sustain the finding of the jury that the defendant was not negligent with respect to giving the plaintiff proper warning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.