Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 ARK 272 - Vance v. State

Vance v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
4
states following
April 1951
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently April 1951 · most notably State v. Sorrentino (1924), Benson v. State (1921)

2 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

110190219101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. United States · Ballew v. United States · Simpson v. State · Routt v. State · Ex parte Sloane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We take this occasion also to call attention to the backward state of the law in this state in reference to the competency of witnesses convicted of felony. The statutes which render such witnesses incompetent belong to a class of antiquated laws which suppress evidence, and which the wisdom of modern ages has discredited and shown to be unreasonable and injurious. They are of the same class as the laws which formerly forbade the parties to the suit from testifying and closed the mouth of the defendant on trial for his life, and' should be repealed as these laws have been repealed, for such matters should go only to the credit or impeachment of the witness — not to the exclusion of his testimony. ’ ’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.