Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 Ark. App. 453 - Mayo v. State

70 Ark. App. 453 - Mayo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cassell v. State · Williams v. State · Freeman v. State · Parette v. State · Yocum v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Constructive possession may be implied where the contraband is found in a place immediately and exclusively accessible to the defendant and subject to his control. Where there is joint occupancy of the premises where the contraband is seized, some additional factor must be found to link the accused to the contraband. In such instances, the State must prove that the accused exercised care, control, and management over the contraband and also that the accused knew that the matter possessed was contraband.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.