In Re Ciraolo’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably 19 Cal. 3d 899 - Rose v. Superior Court (1977), 10 Cal. 3d 237 - In Re Buckley (1973)
7 federal appellate · 66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arthur v. Superior Court · Bridges v. Superior Court · Blodgett v. Superior Court · Inniss v. Municipal Court · Lamberson v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ll that is required is that an order be made reciting the facts constituting the contempt, adjudging the person guilty and prescribing the punishment. [Citations.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`merely to ascertain whether there was sufficient evidence before the trial court'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.