Conway v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2007
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 24 Cal. 2d 1 - Beeler v. American Trust Co. · Fleishman v. Woods · Peters v. Binnard · Nicholson v. Tarpey · 5 Cal. App. 367 - Meridian Oil Co. v. Dunham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Moreover, and in any event, fairness and adequacy of consideration need not be alleged where an agreed upon consideration has been accepted, the acceptance constituting a waiver of any claim of inadequacy. (Peters v. Binnard, 219 Cal. 141 [ 25 P.2d 834 ]; Fleishman v. Woods, 135 Cal. 256 [ 67 P. 276 ]; Nicholson v. Tarpey, 70 Cal. 608 [ 12 P. 778 ]; Meridian Oil Co. v. Dunham, 5 Cal.App. 367 [ 90 P. 469 ].) It should be pointed out that the absence of more specific allegations of fairness and adequacy were not made a ground of special demurrer.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.