Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 CALAPP2D 186 - Creely v. Creely

Creely v. Creely’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
January 1976
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 1976

24 state decisions

1401945195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 56 Cal. App. 2d 791 - Pitzer v. Peterson · 55 Cal. App. 2d 543 - Estate of Hampton · 39 Cal. App. 471 - Moch v. Superior Court · Matter of Guardianship of Michels · 10 Cal. App. 2d 353 - Gilmore v. Paris Inn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “left ... in the care and custody of another without any provision for his support, or without communication from ... his parents, for the period of one year”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Due process of law requires sufficient notice to the parents with an opportunity for them to be heard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.