Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 CONN 484 - State v. Harbourne

State v. Harbourne’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
5
states following
May 1999
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 1999

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

6018981900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Geer v. State of Connecticut · Scott v. Donald · Plumley v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Missouri Ry Co v. Haber · Hennington v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We see no reason to fear any weakening of the protection of the constitutional provision as to commerce among the several states by holding that in regard to such a.message as the one in question, although it comes from a place without the state, it is yet under the- jurisdiction of the state where it is to be delivered (after its arrival therein at the place of delivery), at least so far as legislation of the state tends to enforce the performance of the duty owed by the company under the general law. So long as Congress is silent on the subject,' we think it is within the power of the state government to enact legislation of the nature of the Georgia statute. It is not a case where .the silence of Congress is equivalent to an express enactment””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]hen a state attempts to regulate domestic commerce in an article which it recognizes as a legitimate subject of commerce, so as to discriminate in favor of domestic commerce, and against interstate commerce in that article, the law ceases to be a pure police regulation and becomes a direct interference with interstate commerce.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`Since the establishment of our government wagering has been held to be, if not absolutely immoral, yet so injurious in its results as to require suppression by penal legislation.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.