Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

70 F. 128

Docket No. 21.

Keiper v. Miller

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1895.)

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1895-09-30

<p>Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.</p> <p>This was a suit by Henry B. Keiper and Lanious B. Keiper against Charles Miller to restrain the infringement of a patent The cause was heard in the circuit court on the pleadings and proofs, and the bill dismissed. 68 Eed. 627. ■Complainants appeal.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1913

2 counsel of record

Relies on Trustees v. Greenough · Paul v. Virginia · Goldey v. Morning News

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1895-09-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

¶2This was a suit by Henry B. Keiper and Lanious B. Keiper against Charles Miller to restrain the infringement of a patent The cause was heard in the circuit court on the pleadings and proofs, and the bill dismissed. 68 Eed. 627. ■Complainants appeal.

¶3Jerome Carty, for appellants.

¶4Butterworth & Dowell, for appellee.

¶5Reversed, per stipulation of counsel, and remanded to the court below for further proceedings by agreed decree in the circuit court, as hereto annexed: First, that the equities are with the complainants; second, that the patent mentioned and described in the bill of complaint, and upon which suit is brought, granted to Samuel M. Brua, November 12, 1878 (No. 209,795), is valid, and the defendant has infringed the same in manner and form as in the bill of complaint alleged; and, third, all matters in controversy and claims in dispute between complainants and the defendant having been fully compromised, adjusted, and finally settled, an injunction and accounting are waived.

/70/f1d/128 · .json · Public domain