Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 F.1d 788 - Covert v. Travers Bros. Co.

Covert v. Travers Bros. Co.’s Empirical Analysis

70 F. 788 · 1895

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
December 1939
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1939

2 federal appellate ·

1018951900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Birdsell v. Shaliol · New York Belting & Packing Co. v. New Jersey Car Spring & Rubber Co. · Blessing Et Al. v. Works. · Eclipse Manuf'g Co. v. Adkins · Goebel v. American Railway Supply Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The herein-described method of connecting one part of a rope adjacent to another part, or the ends of two ropes, by clamping the same with one or more open rings of metal, under extreme pressure, as set forth.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.