Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 F.2d 321 - In re Schoenberg

In re Schoenberg’s Empirical Analysis

70 F.2d 321 · 1934

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
March 1984
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1984 · most notably Maggio v. Zeitz (1948), Sampsell v. Imperial Paper & Color Corp. (1941)

13 federal appellate · 2 district ·

130193419401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harrison v. Chamberlin · Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. Fox · Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. Fox · MacDonald v. Plymouth County Trust Co. · In re H. Magen Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As to property within the actual or constructive possession of the bankrupt, a court of bankruptcy can determine in a summary proceeding controversies involving adverse claims of title, but, when possession is held by a third person, adverse claims may not be summarily adjudicated unless by consent or unless the claim is merely colorable. These principles are so well established as scarcely to need citation of authority.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “so far as appears, the proceeds received from disposal of the merchandise may have been used in business expenses and paying merchandise creditors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.