Schiedt v. Dimick’s Empirical Analysis
70 F.2d 558 · 1934
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1996
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co. · In Re Peterson · Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co. · Slocum v. New York Life Insurance · Capital Traction Co. v. Hof
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dimick v. Schiedt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.