Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 F.2d 873 - United States v. Nickle

United States v. Nickle’s Empirical Analysis

70 F.2d 873 · 1934

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
January 1962
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 1962 · most notably Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Black Hills v. Hubbard (1953), Een v. Consolidated Freightways (1955)

26 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1201934194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gunning v. Cooley · Lumbra v. United States · Local 167 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs Stablemen Helpers of America v. United States · Eggen v. United States · Nicolay v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Where complaint is made that the court erred in overruling an objection to the admissibility of evidence, it is generally essential that the objection definitely and specifically state the grounds on which it is based so that the court may intelligently rule upon it. In other words, the appellate court will not reverse on a ruling which overrules an objection to testimony, unless a good objection has been made, even though the testimony might have been objectionable on grounds not specifically and sharply called to the court's attention.' 47”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.