Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 F.2d 910 - In re Sterling

In re Sterling’s Empirical Analysis

70 F.2d 910 · 1934

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
March 1983
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 1983 · most notably In re Miller (1969), In re Gulack (1983)

2 federal appellate ·

120193419401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 31

Relies on Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Pope · In re Russell · In re McKee · In re Reeves · Rand, McNally & Co. v. Exchange Scrip-Book Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The general physical structure of appellant is admittedly old, and such modifications in the adjustment of printed matter thereto as he discloses are mere obvious arrangements of the printing.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Considering claim 1, * * * the physical structure is practically the same as the corresponding physical structure of Watrous. The language printed upon the respective checks and stubs differs, but we have held in a number of cases that the mere arrangement of printed matter on a sheet or sheets of paper does not constitute patentable subject-matter. * * * [cases cited] if arrangement of printed matter may not constitute patentable novelty, it would seem obvious that the substance or language of that which is printed may not do so. [Emphasis ours.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.