Kirkpatrick v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis
70 F.3d 100 · 1995
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2018
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · Bates v. State Bar of Arizona · Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NM · Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The district court correctly determined that it had subject matter jurisdiction only over [plaintiff's] facial challenge to the constitutionality of Florida's general rules and procedures governing admission to the bar[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dale v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.