United States v. Archer’s Empirical Analysis
70 F.3d 1149 · 1995
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably United States v. Romero (2007), United States v. Virgen-Chavarin (2003)
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1344
Relies on Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis v. Carver · Green v. United States · Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Landry · Murphy v. Sullivan · Detroit Auto Dealers Ass'n v. Federal Trade Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e will remand for resentencing ... only if defendant suffered prejudice as a result of the Rule 32 violation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the defendant and his counsel if either can cite any reason to the Court as to why sentence should not be pronounced ... or wish to make a statement in mitigation of punishment or ... any other statement which other statement is properly related to the proceeding.” Unlike the court in the instant case, the court in Archer did not explicitly tell the defendant that he could make any statement he wished, but only one”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.