Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

70 F.3d 1260

Docket No. 95-6896.

Brock v. Briggs

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: November 16, 1995. Decided: November 30, 1995.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-11-30

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Mark Ivan Bedford v. Richard A. Young George Deeds Maggie Watkins Susie Cox

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-11-30

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brock v. Briggs, No. CA-95-466-2 (E.D. Va. May 19 & June 5, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/70/f3d/1260 · .json · Public domain