Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

70 F.3d 1263

Docket No. 95-6614.

Thomas v. Southern Bell Telephone & Company, Inc.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Aug. 8, 1995. Decided Dec. 5, 1995.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-11-27

Relies on United States v. Lipscomb

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-11-27

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

David Ray Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Holly, BRAITHWAITE, MCCANTS, HOLLY & SMITH, Aiken, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Thomas v. Brown, No. CA-93-836-1-6AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 17, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

To the extent that Thomas appeals from the judgment entered November 15, 1994, his appeal is untimely

/70/f3d/1263 · .json · Public domain