Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

70 F.3d 1264

Docket No. 95-6096.

United States v. Jose Zelaya-Galdamez

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Nov. 16, 1995. Decided Nov. 27, 1995.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Williams v. Trent

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-91-14-R, CA-93-626-R)

Anthony Dewayne Ramey, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ramey, Nos. CR-91-14-R; CA-93-626-R (W.D.Va. Dec. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/70/f3d/1264 · .json · Public domain