Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 F.3d 304 - Taft v. Vines

Taft v. Vines’s Empirical Analysis

70 F.3d 304 · 1995

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2017

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

90199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Foman v. Davis · Graham v. Connor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Being the subject of an armed felony stop at night by numerous law enforcement officers most certainly would be a terrifying experience for guilty and innocent alike, regardless of their sex or age. However, in exigent circumstances, the law permits its enforcement officers to conduct such procedures in order to protect the community from a dangerous and violent offender. As frightening as these events must have been for the plaintiffs, these acts present a text book case for the imposition of qualified immunity. Not every mistake and act by “state actors” is premised on constitutional motives.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “entitlement to qualified immunity as to the Appellants' excessive force claims was incorrectly granted by the district court at the summary judgment stage”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “motion for continuance of the summary judgment hearing in order to allow for time to conduct discovery on the issue of qualified immunity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.