Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 F.3d 75 - Franklin v. Duncan

Franklin v. Duncan’s Empirical Analysis

70 F.3d 75 · 1995

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2019

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

120199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brecht v. Abrahamson · Franklin v. Duncan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the face of an accusation . . . charging [the defendant] with the crime for which [he] is now on trial or tending to connect him with its commission . . . may be considered against him as indicating an admission that the accusation thus made was true.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.