Baulch v. Johns’s Empirical Analysis
70 F.3d 813 · 1995
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably Tollett v. City of Kemah (2002), Schwartz v. Millon Air, Inc. (2003)
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Mitchell v. Forsyth · Johnson v. Jones · Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Bourjaily v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny attorney ... who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees reasonably incurred because of such conduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Crampton's actions in refusing to disclose to GM or to the Court her decision to abandon the prosecution of this case were unreasonable and vexatious. The Court also specifically finds that Crampton has acted in bad faith, with improper motive, and with a reckless disregard of the duty owed to the Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“on whether the rate claimed would be reasonable in other cases in the Dallas area”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.