Reed v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
70 F.3d 844 · 1995
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2018
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Ylst v. Nunnemaker · Ford v. Georgia · Fussell v. Price · Dugger v. Adams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'strictly or regularly followed by the cognizant state court ... [and] strictly or regularly applied evenhandedly to the vast majority of similar claims .'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fratta v. Davis“state court opinion [must] clearly and expressly indicate[ ] that its judgment is independent of federal law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fratta v. Davis“we must emphasize the application of the bar to the specific constitutional claim at issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fratta v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.