Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 F.3d 874 - United States v. Jackson

United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

70 F.3d 874 · 1995

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
January 2017
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably United States of America v. Jennifer Aguillard (2000), Bruce Downey v. Joseph Crabtree, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution (1996)

28 federal appellate · 4 district ·

430199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3559 · 18 U.S.C. § 3582 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 510 · 28 U.S.C. § 994

Relies on United States v. Wilson · Linn v. United States · Arensberg v. Brown · United States v. Mathena · United States v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We will affirm a district court's sentence of imprisonment upon mandatory revocation of supervised release provided that the district court considered the applicable policy statements, the sentence is within the range prescribed by statute, and the sentence is not plainly unreasonable.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant; (2) the need for the sentence imposed— (A) to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense; (B) to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct; (C) to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant; and (D) to provide the defendant with needed educational or vocational training, medical care, or other correctional treatment in the most effective mannerf.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Imposition of a sentence of imprisonment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.