Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 F.3d 917 - Veney v. Hogan

Veney v. Hogan’s Empirical Analysis

70 F.3d 917 · 1995

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Bloch v. Ribar (1998), Judge v. City of Lowell (1998)

29 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

280199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “include the specific, non-conclusory allegations of fact that will enable the district court to determine that those facts, if proved, will overcome the defense of qualified immunity”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]t is this sort of inchoate, generalized form of pleading that fails to convey to the district court the information it needs to determine whether a defendant is entitled to qualified immunity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “fails to indicate the precise content and form”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.