Meyer v. Miro

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided July 23, 2003

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-07-23

Cited by 2 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2004

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2003-07-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Mark Meyer appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Meyer v. Miro, No. CA-01-4260-4-25BH (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.