Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 FLA 265 - Ex Parte Pricha

Ex Parte Pricha’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
1
states following
November 2003
most recently cited

54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently November 2003 · most notably Amos v. Mathews (1930), Van Pelt v. Hilliard (1918)

54 state decisions

1901915192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strauder v. West Virginia · Slaughter-House Cases the Butchers' Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. The Crescent City Live · Crowley v. Christensen · Maxwell v. Dow · The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantationss v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““All men are equal before the law, and have certain inalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and pursuing happiness.- and' obtaining safety.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If the title to the act fairly gives notice of the subject of the act, so as reasonably to lead to an inquiry into the body of the bill it is all that is necessary. The title need not be an index to the contents of the bill or act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.