Markham v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1971
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 95A
Relies on Markham v. Allen · Decker v. . Gardner · Herring v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co. · Keeney v. . Home Insurance Company · Commission for Polish Relief, Ltd. v. Banca Nationala a Rumaniei
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under this Ruling it was provided in Section (1) that any unlicensed transfer of funds, such as involved in the present action, was ‘null and void’; and in Section (4) that r.io transfer of such funds by judicial process created a greater right than the owner of the funds could have conferred by voluntary act prior to the issuance of a license.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Any unlicensed transfer of * * * (enemy alien’s funds) * * * was expressly prohibited. And this prohibition was as applicable to a transfer by judicial process as to a transfer by voluntary act.” [ 70 F.Supp. 205 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.