Cruz v. Radtec, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(l)[he] belongs to a protected group; (2)[he] was subjected to unwelcome harassment; (3) the harassment was based on [his political affiliation or beliefs]; (4) the harassment affected a term, condition, or privilege of employment; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take remedial action.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.