¶1 The defendant was convicted of operating a lottery, known as “the number game.” The evidence authorized the jury to find that he was aiding and abetting in the operation of the lottery, and, the offense being a misdemeanor, that he was guilty as a principal.
¶2 The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari based solely upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict.
¶3 Judgment affirmed.