Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 Haw. 343 - State v. Bates

State v. Bates’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2006
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · United States v. Salvador · In the Interest of Doe · State v. Adrian · Shea v. City and County of Honolulu

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) Hearsay exceptions. The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness: [[Image here]] (3) Statement against interest. A statement which was at the time of its making so far contrary to the de-clarant’s pecuniary or proprietary interest, or so far tended to subject the declarant to civil or criminal liability, or to render invalid a claim by the declarant against another, that a reasonable person in the declarant’s position would not have made the statement unless the declarant believed it to be true. A statement tending to expose the declarant to criminal liability and offered to exculpate the accused is not admissible unless corroborating circumstances clearly indicate the trustworthiness of the statement [.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.