Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 Haw. 351 - State v. Roman

State v. Roman’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Colorado v. Spring · United States v. Bayer · Wyrick v. Fields · State v. Wyatt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “regardless of their initial, actual, subjective intent, the police detectives should have realized that they were essentially asking [the defendant] to confess”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]e do not condone any police ignorance about the law and the consequences of a custodial interrogation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.