Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 HAW 566 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2023
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2023

6 state decisions

2019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Addonizio · Dann v. Johnston · State v. Fry · United States v. United States District Court · United States v. Hetrick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “RULE 35. CORRECTION OR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE The court may correct an illegal sentence at any time and may correct a sentence imposed in an illegal manner within the time provided herein for the reduction of sentence. The court may reduce a sentence within 90 days after the sentence is imposed, or within 90 days after receipt by the court of a mandate issued upon affirmance of the judgment or dismissal of the appeal, or within 90 days after entry of any order or judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States denying review of, or having the effect of upholding a judgment of conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.