Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 Ill. App. 3d 980 - Pinelli v. Alpine Development Corp.

70 Ill. App. 3d 980 - Pinelli v. Alpine Development Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently February 2011 · most notably 106 Ill. App. 3d 878 - Luciani v. Bestor (1982), 132 Ill. App. 3d 485 - Premier Electrical Construction Co. v. La Salle National Bank (1984)

1 federal appellate · 50 state decisions

38019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 13 Ill. 2d 45 - Village of Niles v. Szczesny · 33 Ill. App. 3d 943 - Browning v. Heritage Insurance Co. · Barnhart v. Barnhart · 64 Ill. App. 3d 676 - Glass v. Burkett · 63 Ill. 2d 61 - Crane Paper Stock Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The first issue raised is whether the judgment in plaintiffs’ favor may stand where the proof fails to support the allegations of their complaint and where neither their pleadings, proof, nor prayers for relief seek the remedy given. Defendants specifically argue that plaintiffs have not properly alleged and proven rescission and that the relief which the trial court gave plaintiffs was different than the relief which they had requested. Initially, we note that we, as an appellate court, have the power to amend the pleadings on our motion if necessary to conform the pleadings to the proof. (Citations.) In light of the circumstances and facts of this case, an amendment upon our own motion would be appropriate if necessary.” 70 Ill. App. 3d 980, 1000 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.