Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 INDAPP 157 - Muncie Foundry & Machine Co. v. Thompson

Muncie Foundry & Machine Co. v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
June 1962
most recently cited

79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1962 · most notably United States v. Silk (1947), Bowen v. Gradison Construction Company (1930)

79 state decisions

390191919201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Inland Steel Co. v. Lambert · Retmier v. Cruse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The board is, by the statute, required to find the facts upon which it bases an award. ... In cases of this character there are five facts which must be found as a legal basis for an award of compensation, viz.: (1) That claimant was an employee. (2) That he received an injury by accident. (3) That the accident arose out of and in the course of the employment. (4) The character and extent of such injury. (5) Claimant’s average weekly wage.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.