Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 INDAPP 205 - Feichter v. Korn

Feichter v. Korn’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 1972
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1972

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

401919192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Graham v. Henderson Elevator Co. · Watson Coal & Mining Co. v. Casteel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellant insists that the exhibits to the complaint taken together constitute the contract, the specific performance of which he seeks in his action. There is no reference whatever in any one of these instruments to either of the others, and without such reference, under the statute of frauds which requires that all contracts for the sale of real estate shall be in writing, they cannot be construed together as constituting the contract, for extrinsic evidence cannot be heard to show their relation each to the others. The evidence of the relation must be within the instruments themselves. Many authorities sustain this principle, among which we cite Graham v. Henderson Elevator Co. (1916), 60 Ind. App. 697 , 111 N. E. 332 , which- contains a full discussion of the question, and cites numerous authorities.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.