Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 KAN 160 - Shanks v. Pearson

Shanks v. Pearson’s Empirical Analysis

1904

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
May 1948
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Woodman v. Davis · Shanks v. Pearson · Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Bankers & Merchants' Telegraph Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendant in error challenges the jurisdiction of this court on the ground that the proceeding in error was not commenced within thirty days after the final judgment dissolving the temporary.injunction. General pleadings were filed by both parties, the cause tried on its merits, and judgment rendered dissolving the temporary injunction, and for costs. It is contended that this court cannot acquire jurisdiction to reverse a judgment vacating an injunction, unless the proceeding be instituted in this court within thirty days from the date of the rendition of such judgment, as provided in section 5053, General Statutes of 1901. The provisions of that section have application only to proceedings to reverse interlocutory orders dissolving injunctions. They have no application to proceedings in error to reverse a final judgment in an injunction suit.” (p. 161.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.