Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 KAN 203 - State v. Tyree

State v. Tyree’s Empirical Analysis

1904

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
10
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

2 district · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably In Re Lee (1918), State v. Latham & York (1962)

2 district · 27 state decisions — followed in 10 states

50190419101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife. · Kring v. State of Missouri · General Oil Co. v. Crain · Wallace v. State · Murphy v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It appears from the language used in this section that the power to remand the cause with proper instructions is as explicit as the power to reverse, affirm or modify, and it is equally plain that in all cases where the judgment is either reversed, or modified, except as provided in section 292, the cause must be remanded to the court below with proper instructions. The only authority this court has for discharging an appellant upon the reversal of a judgment is found in section 292, supra, and under the provisions of that section it is only when the judgment is reversed and it appears that no offense whatever has been committed. In all other cases the cause must be remanded to the court below with instructions.” (p. 211.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““reverse, affirm, or modify the judgment appealed from, and may, if necessary or proper, order, a new trial. In either case, the cause must be remanded to the court below, with proper instructions, and the opinion of the court, within the time, and in the manner, to be prescribed by the rule of the court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.