Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 KAN 595 - Williams v. Vincent

Williams v. Vincent’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2015

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

50190519101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Small v. Small · Guptil & Hinton v. McFee · Bequillard v. Bartlett · Bliss v. Vedder · White v. Gemeny

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * other person, to the exercise of whose trade or business tools or implements are necessary,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.