Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 KAN 692 - State v. Scott

State v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
6
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2015

10 state decisions

30190519101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. United States · Bonahan v. State of Nebraska · Selma and Meridian Railroad Company v. Louisiana National Bank of New Orleans · Commonwealth v. Andrews · People of the State of N.Y. v. . Genet

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * the provisions of the statutes giving to defendants in criminal cases the right to make a bill of exceptions are not so absolute as to displace all the other principles which belong to criminal proceedings, but must be taken in subordination to them. We think they do not require the courts to encourage escapes and facilitate the ^evasion of the justice of the state by extending to escaped convicts the means of reviewing their convictions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.