Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

70 Mass. 297

Brigham v. Smith

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1855

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1855-10-15

<p>A deed of warranty does not estop the grantor to claim a way of necessity over the land granted.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1908

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1855-10-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Thomas, J.

¶1If A conveys land to B, to which B can have access only by passing over other land of A, a way of necessity passes by the grant. If A conveys land to B, leaving other-land of A, to which he can have access only by passing over the land granted, a way of necessity is reserved in the grant. These points are settled, as well in the cases cited for the plaintiff', as those cited for the defendant.

¶2Is the rule affected by the fact that the grantor conveyed by deed of warranty ? We think not. If the way were expressly reserved in the deed, the covenants must apply to the premises granted, that is, an estate with a right of way reserved or carved out of the fee. In the present case, the law does for the parties the same thing, and the covenants apply to an estate with this way of necessity reserved.

¶3 Exceptions sustained.

/70/mass/297 · .json · Public domain