Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 MD 78 - Englar v. Offutt

Englar v. Offutt’s Empirical Analysis

1889

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
15
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably Standard Oil Co. of Ky. v. Hawkins (1896), Union National Bank v. Goetz (1891)

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 36 state decisions — followed in 15 states

17018891890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The true owner of a fund traced to the possession of another has a right to have it restored,' not as a debt due and owing, but because it is his property wrongfully withheld from him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.