70 Md. App. 147 - Golub v. Spivey’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2004
2 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Varney v. Lucerne-In-Maine Village Corp. · Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tyrrell · Kelley v. R.G. Industries, Inc. · Commission on Medical Discipline v. Stillman · Nottingham Village, Inc. v. Baltimore County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the court may compel compliance with the rule or may determine the consequences of the noncompliance in light of the totality of the circumstances and the purpose of the rule.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The panel chairman in a health claims arbitration proceeding has the authority to decide all prehearing procedures including issues relating to discovery. § 3-2A-05(c). We believe exclusion of expert testimony on Dr. Golub’s behalf was an appropriate sanction for Dr. Golub’s failure to comply with the discovery deadline in the panel chairman’s scheduling order.” (Footnotes omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.