Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 70 Md. App. 170 - Leaf Co. v. Montgomery County

70 Md. App. 170 - Leaf Co. v. Montgomery County’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2001
most recently cited

2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2001

2 district · 6 state decisions

40198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lipsitz v. Parr · Shoreham Developers, Inc. v. Randolph Hills, Inc. · Town of Berwyn Heights v. Rogers · 57 Md. App. 437 - First National Bank v. Burton, Parsons & Co. · City of Hagerstown v. Long Meadow Shopping Center

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The contract is one for services already performed, which is not susceptible of recission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.